The true value of a machine learning project is hidden in the performance that the model exhibits in the production environment. Data scientists can develop algorithms over the course of months, but without the right tools to measure the success of the model, that effort can be wasted. It is precisely at this point that regression metrics come into play and offer the possibility of evaluating the quality of numerical estimates with objective criteria.
Today, businesses rely on regression models in a myriad of areas, from sales projections to demand forecasts, price optimization to risk analysis. But choosing and interpreting the right metrics is critical to understanding whether a model really works. The wrong choice of metrics can lead to both wasted resources and wrong business decisions.
Regression metrics are mathematical indicators that measure the success of machine learning models in numerical value predictions. These metrics allow performance evaluation by quantitatively expressing the difference between the model's predictions and the actual data.
Every regression metric is based on the concept of residual. Residual is the difference between the actual value and the estimated value for a data point. If expressed by a simple formula: residual = true value - estimated value. Regression metrics treat these residuals with different mathematical methods, reducing the overall performance of the model to a single number.
The main difference of regression metrics from classification metrics is that they work with continuous numerical values. Categorical results such as true-false are evaluated in classification problems, while in regression metrics how far apart the estimates are becomes important. For example, a deviation of 5 thousand pounds or 50 thousand pounds in a house price estimate represents different error sizes, and the metrics are designed to capture this nuance.
MSE is one of the most frequently used metrics in regression problems. After each estimation error is squared and summed, it is divided by the number of observations. This process disproportionately highlights major errors because errors are squared.
The main advantage of MSE is that it is mathematically derivable. This feature plays a critical role in optimization algorithms and forms the basis of learning methods such as gradient descent. While MSE is minimized during model training, it is aimed that the total estimates are equal to the sum of the real values. This allows the model to produce projections that are not mirrored on average.
But MSE has a significant drawback: it is highly sensitive to outliers. A few major errors in the dataset can significantly increase the MSE value. Also, due to the squaring process, the metric is not expressed in the original units, but in the square of the units. This can make interpretation difficult.
RMSE is obtained by taking the square root of MSE. This simple mathematical transformation brings the metric back to the scale of the target variable and improves interpretability. If you are estimating the order quantity on an ecommerce site and your RMSE value is 15, this number makes sense because it is on the same scale as the original unit.
RMSE carries the same characteristics as MSE. It gives weight to large errors and produces the same results as MSE for model optimization. In fact, when a model is optimized for MSE, it is also optimized for RMSE.
In practice, RMSE is often preferred because it offers more understandable language when explaining results to business stakeholders. But the point to note is that the RMSE being 10 does not mean that you have an error of 10 units on average. RMSE is a more complex indicator that reflects the distribution of errors.
The MAE averages the absolute values of the errors. Unlike MSE, there is no squaring process, so all errors are evaluated with equal weight. The formula is extremely simple: the absolute value of each error is taken and their sum is divided by the number of observations.
The most obvious advantage of MAE is its resistance to outliers. Large errors are not disproportionately penalized because there is no square taking. This property makes MAE an ideal choice in scenarios where outliers are present in the dataset.
Since the metric is on the same scale as the target variable, it is easy to interpret. However, since the absolute value function is not derivable at every point, it can create difficulties in some optimization algorithms. When optimizing for MAE, in fact, the median value is sought, that is, half of the estimates must be greater than the true value, and half should be smaller.
The R-square measures the variance explanatory power of the regression model. This metric takes values between 0 and 1 and shows the extent to which the independent variables explain the variability in the dependent variable. If the R² value is 0.75, the model can account for 75 percent of the variance in the target variable.
Mathematically, R-square is calculated by subtracting the ratio of the model's sum of error squares (RSS) to total squares sum (TSS) from 1. TSS represents the error of a simple averaging model, while RSS indicates the error of the current model. By comparing these two values, R² measures how much improvement the model provides over the simple average.
R-square is a relative metric and is used to compare models trained on the same data set. A high R² value indicates better fit, but may indicate overfitting. Therefore, the R-square alone is not sufficient and must be evaluated in conjunction with other metrics.
Adjusted R² is preferred in multiple regression models. The standard R-frame never drops as new features are added to the model, which can be misleading. Adjusted R², on the other hand, offers a more realistic assessment by punishing meaningless features.
MAPE is one of the most popular metrics in the business world because it expresses results as a percentage. This format makes it easier for non-technical stakeholders to understand model performance. The MAPE is the average of the absolute value of the ratio of each error to the actual value and is multiplied by 100, represented in percent.
The main advantage of MAPE is that it is independent of scale. You can compare model performance across datasets of different scales. For example, you can evaluate both million-pound sales estimates and dozens of product requests with the same metric.
However, MAPE has serious limitations. When the real value is zero, the problem of dividing by zero arises, and the metric becomes undefined. In addition, MAPE is an asymmetric metric. The percent error is limited to a maximum of 100 percent if the estimate is lower than the true value, while if the estimate is higher than the real value, this limit does not exist. This creates a bias that leads MAPE to make low estimates.
According to IDC's 2024 report, model monitoring and performance evaluation tools in machine learning operations play a critical role in automating the AI lifecycle of enterprises. Platforms that constantly monitor model performance are equipped with drift detection and automatic warning systems.
The correct choice of metrics varies depending on the characteristics of the dataset and business requirements. If you have frequent outliers in your dataset, MAE can give more reliable results. MSE or RMSE should be preferred if you want to specifically punish large errors.
The preferences of the business side are also decisive. Is the prediction aspect important? In some scenarios, a low estimate can be more costly than a high estimate. For example, when forecasting demand, a low estimate leads to stock depletion, while a high estimate leads to excess inventory, and these costs can be different.
Scale dependence should also be considered. If you are going to compare problems at different scales, you need scale-independent metrics like MAPE. But if you are working on a single problem, MSE, RMSE or MAE is more practical.
Using multiple metrics is the best approach. Each metric reveals a different aspect of the model. The R-square shows overall explicability, while the RMSE reflects the magnitude of the prediction errors, and the MAE reflects the resistance to outliers. Assessing these metrics together paints a comprehensive picture of the model.
Regression metrics are used in the financial industry in a wide range from credit risk scoring to portfolio optimization. Banks measure the accuracy of regression models with MAE and RMSE when assessing customer creditworthiness. An average error of 5 points in a bank's credit prediction model can have significant financial impact over millions of transactions.
Demand forecasting is critical in the retail sector. Supermarket chains use regression models to optimize product inventories and track the performance of these models with MAPE. A MAPE value of 10 percent is considered an acceptable level of accuracy in inventory management.
E-commerce platforms resort to regression analysis for price optimization. Dynamic pricing algorithms maximize profit margins by predicting demand flexibility. The R-squared value shows how effective the pricing strategy is in these systems.
Real estate appraisal companies use regression metrics extensively in their real estate price estimates. RMSE values of models that estimate prices based on factors such as the location, size and characteristics of a house reveal the reliability of the forecasts.
With the evolution of artificial intelligence technology, automatic selection and optimization of regression metrics is gaining importance. AutoML platforms are able to automatically determine the optimal metric based on the characteristics of the dataset. This approach reduces the margin of error while speeding up the manual metric selection process for data scientists.
Customized metric development is also becoming increasingly common. Businesses are designing hybrid metrics based on their specific business requirements. For example, a logistics company may use a special metric that imposes heavier penalties for delays in estimating delivery times.
In the framework of Explainable AI, regression metrics are made more understandable. Not just a numeric value, but visualizations and explanations that show which features contribute to errors are presented. This trend is leading to wider acceptance of models in the business world.
Regression metrics are indispensable tools for evaluating the performance of machine learning models with objective criteria. Metrics such as MSE, RMSE, MAE, R-square and MAPE offer different strengths for different scenarios. In order to select the correct metric, the characteristics of the dataset, business requirements, and prediction direction preferences should be considered.
A successful model evaluation is not limited to a single metric. Using multiple metrics together reveals a comprehensive picture of the model and provides reliable information to both technical and business stakeholders. With the development of artificial intelligence, the selection and interpretation of metrics is also moving towards automation, while understanding the basic principles remains critical.
Contact our team of experts to maximize the performance of your machine learning models and evaluate them with the right metrics. Contact us for detailed information about our data science solutions.
Connectivity analytics is an emerging discipline that helps to explore the interrelated connections and effects between people, products, processes, machines, and systems within a network by mapping these connections and continuously monitoring the interactions between them.
IVR is a telephone technology that interacts with callers through pre-recorded voice messages, also known as Voice Response System.
Hugging Face is an open source platform that offers a comprehensive ecosystem for the development, sharing and distribution of machine learning models.
We work with leading companies in the field of Turkey by developing more than 200 successful projects with more than 120 leading companies in the sector.
Take your place among our successful business partners.
Fill out the form so that our solution consultants can reach you as quickly as possible.
By combining our 30+ years of experience and experience with the centers of excellence in our ecosystem, we prepare your organization to lead the digital transformation!
